JADM210 (Introduction to Corrections) Professor: Conis, Peter (Dr. C) Today is Friday, October 6, 2017, and Current Time is 12:14 pm (Pacific Standard Time) Discussion Topic Week 6: The Death Penalty Week 6 Major Course Objectives: No. 9 and No. 10 (9: Rehab Goals for Offenders, 10: Case Law and the Affect of Rights or Changes for the Use of the Death Penalty in the United States of America before and after Furman v. Georgia) RIGHTS of PRISONERS: Frequently Asked Questions
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Collapse SubdiscussionRachel Sakhi Student: Rachel Sakhi, JADM210 (Introduction to Corrections)Professor: Conis, Peter (Dr. C)Today is Friday, October 6, 2017, and Current Time is 12:14 pm (Pacific Standard Time)Discussion Topic Week 6: The Death PenaltyWeek 6 Major Course Objectives: No. 9 and No. 10 (9: Rehab Goals for Offenders, 10: Case Law and the Affect of Rights or Changes for the Use of the Death Penalty in the United States of America before and after Furman v. Georgia)RIGHTS of PRISONERS: Frequently Asked Questions- Should prisoners suffer for being non-violent?
- Should prisoners suffer for being competent?
- Should prisoners receive beatings in the form of a different gesture that doesn't violate laws?
- What is considered torture of a prisoner?
- What is a hate crime arrest?
- What is a hate crime stalking?
- How does hate crime differ from domestic violence?
- How does hate crime differ from self-abuse?
- How does hate crime differ from minority social status of unwanted racial groups as an scapegoat of a hate crime among social status groups of certain races?
- Compare and Contrast: affirmative action, hate crime, domestic violence, and illegal slave trading.
- How does a victim prove the differences between the small crime and the big crime to expose in court?
- How many people does it take to commit an ongoing hate crime?
- How many corporations does it take to commit an ongoing slave trading agenda?
- Is slave trading legal? If so, in what parts of the world? If not, how so and under what law in the United States?
- If slave trading is NOT legal in the United States of America, then is human trafficking legal?
- How would one individual define the rights to collect the resources of 20-40 family members of one individual? Under what laws today in 2017?
- What excuse would be valid to prove in a court of law that one individual is deserving of an ongoing hate crime for at least 8 months prior to birth and 37 years after birth?
- If no excuse is available, then who creates the laws to uphold slave trade without an individual's knowledge?
- Is slave trading theft? Or is slave trading organized crime of losers who refuse to work for themselves?
- If slave trading is currently legal in the United States of America, please reinact the law to give the slaves a fair chance to relocate to another continent and assist the slave traders in finding efficient work to purchase food, and other basic necessities of survival instead of shopping for relatives, houses, cars, jobs, spouses, children, clothing, money, potential money, potentially authored books with fake IRS slave money theft levies to collect millions of dollars and then if paid with one book writing, will be a recurring evidence of incoming financial ability to continue to support someone's lazy family and kids that can't read or write for the next 60 - 89 years of desired longevity.
Klein described methods of ongoing hate crimes that are considered hate crimes from the victim's perspective, but from the organized criminals who laugh it off daily, it's just a high social status game of hunting down the slave to collect the harvest of the individuals' life earnings and self-worth inclusive of relatives, chidlren, and/or friends and loved ones as well as pets "Involuntary medical treatment - treatment that is administered at the direction of the government, over the objection of the patient - potentially compromises several individual constitutional interests. By definition, involuntary medical treatment burdens the individual's interest in making an autonomous decision to refuse medical treatment, an interest protected by the Due Process Clause. 1 Involuntary medical treatment that is administered for the purpose of obtaining evidence of a crime additionally threatens the individual's interest in avoiding unreasonable governmental intrusions upon his privacy and personal security, an interest protected by the Fourth Amendment. 2 Like all individual constitutional rights, rights under both the Due Process Clause and the Fourth Amendment can be outweighed by sufficiently important government interests. 3 To determine whether involuntary medical treatment violates the Due Process Clause, courts ask whether the government's interest that the treatment advances is important enough to justify compromising the individual's interest in making an autonomous decision to refuse medical treatment. 4 Involuntary treatment must also be medically appropriate, but any physical harms that the treatment might cause are not balanced directly against the government's interest. For example, if the government sought to administer involuntary antipsychotic medications for the purpose of rendering a criminal defendant competent to stand trial, a court would ask whether the medications were medically appropriate, but would not ask whether the government's interest in bringing the defendant to trial justified the potential harms of the medications. 5 Involuntary antipsychotic medications would be" (Klein, 2009).ReferencesKLEIN, D. W. (2009). Unreasonable: Involuntary Medications, Incompetent Criminal Defendants, and the Fourth Amendment. San Diego Law Review, 46161.Edited by Rachel Sakhi on Oct 6 at 3:24pm
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment